MOST NOTEWORTHY: Fiserv, Arbitron and Anadarko Petroleum were today's noteworthy upgrades:
JMP Securities upgraded Fiserv (NASDAQ: FISV) to Outperform from Market Perform citing a reversal of the Bank of America in-house risk, potential re-branding initiatives, and relative pricing stability.
Bear upgraded Arbitron (NYSE: ARB) to Outperform from Peer Perform citing PPM earnings growth potential, strong industry position, defensive nature of shares, and it views the company as an acquisition target.
Lehman raised Anadarko Petroleum (NYSE: APC) to Overweight from Equal Weight citing relative valuation and strong U.S. gas exposure.
OTHER UPGRADES:
Goldman added Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT) to its Conviction Buy List.
During Thursday's trading, Anadarko Petroleum (NYSE: APC) hit an all-time high of $78.75 and closed at $77.62. Anadarko was one of my first recommendations after I started writing for BloggingStocks, and is nearing 100% appreciation from the $40 price tag it had when we acquired it.
The 10-year chart below indicates the strong long-term performance of Anadarko, rising about 500% and paying dividends to boot. I cannot say the stock is a bargain at recent highs, but I can emphatically state that this company belongs on your watch list.
After yesterday's closing bell Anadarko Petroleum (NYSE: APC) reported strong earnings. Excluding nonrecurring items, Anadarko's earnings totaled $1.44 per share for the quarter. On average, analysts were expecting just $1.22 per share. When compared with last year, Anadarko's quarterly profit per share surged more than 40%.
Day one of the two-day FDA Anesthetic/Life Support Drugs & Drug Safety/Risk Management Advisory Committees meeting: Purdue Pharma's NDA for Oxycontin.
Anadarko Petroleum (NYSE:APC) to report Q1 earnings; conference call Tuesday at 10:00am.
Tuesday, May 6
Day two of the two-day FDA Anesthetic/Life Support Drugs & Drug Safety/Risk Mgmt Advisory Committees meeting: Cephalon's (NASDAQ:CEPH) sNDA for Fentora.
Molson Coors (NYSE:TAP) to report Q1 earnings; conference call at 12:00pm.
TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says it's not a strong-dollar sell -- the story here is still too good.
Why did natural gas go down last week? What was that? Inventories were down. The commodity price was up. The fuel itself is green. It is better than ethanol and it is being used to fuel an increasing numbers of cars and trucks.
The whole move down had to have been triggered by something, right? Yeah, how about the fact that the stocks were up a lot and were due for some profit-taking.
Recall that the real "reason" they went down is that the dollar "got strong," and that was supposed to trigger commodity deflation; natural gas is a commodity and is therefore going to go down. (Barron's made this very case this weekend, oblivious to the facts, but loving the theory.)
This kind of thinking is just so stupid that it shows you can get chance after chance after chance to own the fuel that can take care of the nation if we just let it. Of course, the stocks began to come back later in the week as threats of supply cut-offs of crude -- they came true this weekend -- made natural gas declines virtually impossible, despite the "sense" that it peaked. So the money has came back and I believe will continue to come back.
It should not come as a surprise to many that as crude oil pushed $120 per barrel and gas prices passed $4 a gallon at the pump Anadarko Petroleum (NYSE: APC) reached a new 52 week high of $71.12 and finished Tuesday at $70.07. The stock is up over 75% (not including the dividend) since I recommended it last year.
At the time I disclosed that I acquired the stock at $40 and suggested this was a keeper. I like the fact that the company has a substantial amount of its proven oil and natural gas reserves in North America. It also pays a modest dividend 0.52% while sporting a P/E under 9 (TTM). When last I posted on the subject -- Serious Money: great picks: Aluminum Co. of China & Anadarko -- about ten weeks ago, APC was trading at $55, down from its previous high, though still returning a nice gain. That was the time to buy on the dip if you were watching it.
There are many that fear the bear hasn't died. Maybe he's hibernating. But if the bear isn't gone, he's at least lost some teeth. In the last hour of trading today, the DJIA was up more than 900 points from its intraday lows seen just last Monday. Despite weaker home prices trends not seen for 20 years and despite an absolutely dismal ugly Consumer Confidence report, the market managed to do well today despite mixed index averages at the closing bell. There was not a single earnings report that can be used for "the focus" that turned the whole market. It looks like there was actually real buying interest coupled by short covering. Here are the unofficial closing bell index averages for today:
DJIA 12,532.60 (-16.04; -0.13%)
S&P500 1,352.99 (+3.11; +0.23%)
NASDAQ 2,341.05 (+14.30; +0.61%)
10YR-TBond 3.492% (-0.03)
Monsanto (NYSE: MON) rose almost 10% to $114.54 after the agriculture giant raised guidance for both Q2 and for fiscal 2008 based on strong seed sales and all other markets firing on all cylinders.
Earlier in the week I posted about finding the market bottom using that age-old handheld calculator, a white paper napkin. So, unfortunately it looks like I may be right again. Not exactly something I was hoping for, but if it has to be, it has to be. I wonder if my old napkin can outperform Wall Street super computers?
Is this an auction to the bottom? Are investors bidding things down instead of up? Looks like it from all the negative sentiment. Consumer sentiment is down, and short sellers are all excited, increasing their negative positions to new highs every day.
And here is the all-telling sign of capitulation: the ever-lying overly optimistic government is starting to admit how bad things are and throwing hundreds of billions of dollars at the problem. When does the turnaround come?
One of our readers commented recently that I had earned his respect because I always tracked and posted my bad picks not just the good picks. I have been told this often but it is not so uncommon in better publications. Barron's weekly and Fortune Magazine both do the same. It's only fair, and should be standard operating procedure. I have not seen James Cramer do it but then he makes thousands of recommendations so how can he track anything?
I also think that in a blog you have the opportunity to establish a dialogue with readers and might even learn something. I have learned plenty from readers and colleagues alike. So having exposed some of my failings in the past month I thought I would look back and and review some of my successful picks.
When I posted Chasing value: Aluminum Corporation of China ADS eleven months ago in March, ACH was $22.98. It closed yesterday at $39.03 for a 70% gain. It had reached a 52-week high of $90.95 in between. We took some money off the table at $88 and are now playing with the 'house money'. This one has worked out great.
APC, an oil and gas exploration company has a market cap of $26 billion with long term debt of $11.1 billion. APC had September 2007 total revenue of $3 billion.
Crude oil futures are at $91.17, down 1.26% according to Bloomberg.
APC February option implied volatility of 43 is above its 26-week average of 34 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price risks.
TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says there are some names that will work here, but they're a small slice of the total market pie.
Can someone, anyone, tell me why we can bank on this Fed? "The Fed has to cut 50 basis points or we are going to Dow 12,500."
Yeah, OK. I get it. Fed panicked and cut 50 last time we were shocked with a weak employment number. Maybe they will do it again.
But I look at it a different way. This Fed thinks it is smarter than all of us. It looks at ways to tinker to bring down the short-rates without attacking them head on. They are clever.
To quote one of my college professors (with thick Chicago accent) "Ya pays yer nickle 'n ya takes ya bes' shot." This year I wrote over 200 stories and reviewed even more stocks. Going over all of this material I came up with the ones listed here as my four best and four worst of the year.
If you would have acquired these eight stocks you would be up 21.79%, about double the NASDAQ, triple the DJIA and 550% over the S&P 500. Had I followed the advice of some of my more astute readers or been more cynical about the forthrightness and leadership in the financial sector, I would have had a really smashing year. As it was, I cannot complain. I think this coming year I will have to analyze some of the feedback even more closely than I have in the past -- keep those comments coming!
Here are the results of the indices from December 28, 2006 through December 27, 2007 for comparison: